Things I Would Twit About

I have enough problems getting past my self censorship to write a worthwhile article, so the thought of random acts of twitting scare me.

Lately people are using Twitter to update their status messages, which IMHO makes the wall posts on Facebook even more annoying. I recognize that the network is for younger folk than me, but I have to believe that eventually the work of life will push a lot of this drivel to the side.

But of course, it may be that I am just overly self absorbed and should not really be questioning “if I should give a twit or not.”

Over the course of the last month, single thoughts have come to my mind that should have generated articles, but lay on the page as sentence fragments.

This is my attempt to purge them from the cache and create my own supertwist of random thoughts.
1)    Crowdsourcing Capital – Did the investment clubs do better at escaping the markets demise,  Should we have an Angel investment club?
2)    I finally had my first video demo that was based on the technology from beginning to end. How come HD voice is still not demo’d well?
3)    Can we blame the downfall of the Nortel on the DMS 250 give away of 1996.  In other words, did the company grow the sales rather than maximize the profits?
4)    Now that my Wife is on Facebook, how long before something cooler is the rage for my daughters?
5)    The power of GSM was in the interopearability of the association, why are Femtocells, not looking to capitalize on that rather than hardwiring to specific providers?
6)    If Skype can send me a phony SS7 ID of 123456 or 00000, why can’t they send me a person’s presence ID?
7)    How can a legitimate Nigerian, get help in the world, when there are so many Nigerian scams going on?
8)    Opposing views – I use my gmail account to gather the stuff I want to read and manage spam,  but most of my friends use their gmail account for legimate email, and my personal account ends up in their spam folder.

Then of course are some fun posts,
a)    If March Madness is won by a team not from the big east will they give them all four number 1 seeds next time?
b)    Is their difference between a credit default swap and Bernie Madeoff? Neither could prove they deserved the trust extended.
c)     Which is more effective, Sarbanes Oxley or a Jonathan Stewart interview?
d)    Of course the networks are dumb, look where we placed the smart cards.
e)    If you need a network to be social, that’s not social networking.

I feel like so much of the social networking environment is ego driven.  How many watchers can you gather, is not a game I care to play.  I like it when words have meaning and results.  Even my comedy needs the results of a laugh. Otherwise this is just a twit in the woods.

tPhishing Twitter

I am taking classes about security and needed to find a recent problem.  The professor and I dont see eye to eye already on some issues and I think this will be a tough class for me to succeed in.  Anyway.  I have decided I am going to pay attention to the security side of social networking.

Being web based, cross scripting is very problematic and thanks to a previous bug in Twitter, some phishers have been able to send direct messages.

The message reads, “hey! check out this funny blog about you… hxxp://jannawalitax.blogspot.com”  From there you are redirected to the url “hxxp://twitter.access-logins.com/login” which is a bogus twitter site.

Because the site is in China it has not been successfully shut down as of yet.  However, Firefox and some other browsers are now aware of the bogus URL and will block the attempt to go to the page.

Now I am not sure, what is to be gained in hacking on social networks.  I find myself boring and on Twitter i feel the mundane is celebrated, but maybe you do more fascinating things than me.  And maybe you use your credit card on this system.

If you do I would be careful.

Reference

http://spylogic.net/?amount=0&blogid=1&query=twitter

http://status.twitter.com/post/68196572/dont-share-your-secret-info

Confessions of a Shoe Makers Son

For those who don’t know the analogy the rule of thumb is that the shoe makers son has no shoes.

In my case, my technology problems are always an embarassment to me.

My Blackberry address book is roughly a quarter of what it used to be despite my efforts to make it so every number ended up on the SIM.

Putting it on the SIM is a joke!

The SIM has a one to one name to number accounting so everyone who i had multiple numbers for I either have multiple name entries (with no distinction) or I have lost a number (hopefully the first one was the best one).

Worse yet.  Names that I expect to have in there are no longer there and finding the number to put in is no longer simple.

Plaxo has gone from a useful tool, to an irrelevant social network, which by the way is my feeling towards alot of my experiences on social networks.

Any way.  If you have me in your system call me.  So I can add you to mine.

You will help this shoemaker’s son.

Is Facebook the AOL of its time

Sometimes even typing the title of blog post is scary.  I expect to get some pushback on this one.

At Gigaom’s blog this weekend was the analysis that Social Networks had peeked.  I always try to be a contrarian.  My history is to never join a ground swell in either direction.  So this obviously has to be the an upbeat discussion.

So let me put this in terms of what I see with the wife and kids.  My wife is still an active AOL user.  She has email loops and favorites and if she ever was going to leave AOL it would be because those features disappear.  In other words, her good will is almost everlasting. AOL is her address book and her buddy list. AOL lost its “cool” was when broadband became available and apps were discovered by the subscribers that made AOL’s interm portals irrelevant.

Facebook has very similar relationships with my kids.  The “kewl” factors are the network they have with their friends. And the groups and apps are minor for them the networking and the wall is a great asynchronous communication amongst their friends.

So what would drive the friends off of Facebook?

I think a mis-step in privacy and the effort to insert more financially viable solutions may allow the kids to look elsewhere.  As Facebook starts to lose execs and add new executives from Google and Yahoo! the question is will the kids be everlasting Facebook users.

The obvious question is what are they willing to pay for? Unlike AOL, Facebook has set their prize at zero.

I would love the analysis of the change in Facebook use five years after graduation.

So far I don’t see the driver to leave.

“Am I the Only One” Social Network

Caveat:  The domains are for sale, and if anyone wants to partner I am open to this idea.

Facebook has become an email tool to me.  I am not someone who shares my personal interests in a social network, I would prefer to keep these things, well – personal.

So as I look for a work oriented social network, I am dismayed by the clubs, groups, favorites, movies and other categories i have to fill out.

Friends invite me to lots of these things.

I do not want to offend anyone with my lack of interest in their causes, faith and politics.  Close friends know I am very opinionated about these things, but the history associated with them is the basis and its not a fad oriented grab your attention experience for me.

I want a no nonsense work oriented network.

I want to see a window into my fellows blogs (related to work) and a trend trend tracker.

So the question is am I the only one?

Wall Street Groups?

There is a famous story of the man who was getting a stock tip from the shoe shine and decided when the shoe shine had money in the market, things were overleveraged and pulled out just before the crash.

Its a nice story and i do not know if its true.

But i want to make a point about over leveraging.

Social networks are now a fad and the new Wall Street Journal has a community section that i am lurking on.

Do I really need this and is the crowdsourcing going to be valuable?

The answer is it depends on the crowd.  If the shoe shines are the ones on the site (and by the way I think I may resemble one in terms of my financial expertise).  Then the site is irrelevant. If it has some value, why not enable to be elsewhere?

So I would like the help of my friends to lurk and tell me what they think?

NxtComm in Vegas

Sometimes its clear that venue is a help. Running conferences where the tag line for the city is “what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas” does not make a sales lead sound viable. Unless of course blackmail works :<).

Talking with friends I have yet to determine whether I should go out there or not. On the one hand I can support some of my friends and colleagues in there efforts. And I can show my face to the community.

On the other hand. Vegas on my tight budget is like putting an elephant on a tightrope. The odds that the elephant is going to stay in line are slim. (is that a pun?)

So at this point I am uncommitted. And it sounds like I am not alone.

I think the show lacks the Internet crowd. Google and the social network types are not participating, nor are the Over The Top Video companies.

The core of Nxtcomm is the network core as well. It’s the blend of Alcatel Lucent, Ciena, Cisco, Juniper, Nortel, Sonus and Tellabs.

So is Nxtcomm a big iron show that is looking at End of Life, or like Ironman is it about to emerge as a superhero?

What do you think?